That's sure what it looked like, at the very least. As a special favor to Borchers for posting all of the evidence to WaPo readers, we’ve decided to give him one more surprise video to share at the end of this article.On Tuesday, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump did something that's drawn him pointed condemnation from various directions, including an angry denouncement from The New York Times- during a rally in the crucial primary state of South Carolina, Donald Trump mocked journalist Serge Kovaleski's disability in the middle of his speech, in front of thousands of supporters. Nevertheless, mission accomplished! Although Borchers was forced to surround the videos with excuses, we have finally gotten the Washington Post to publish important video files of Trump impersonating a flustered general and a flustered Cruz as well as link to video footage of the non-spastic reporter. Oh, if we only had a friend as loyal as Mr. Borchers. Imagine our surprise when, lo and behold, the day after Coulter released her latest column, WaPo writer, Callum Borchers wrote yet another dishonest piece trying to defend himself, his fellow media, and his candidate Hillary Clinton from Coulter’s charges. You can read it here: Washington Post Deletes Video Evidence Showing Trump Didn’t Mock Reporter’s Disability After discovering this, we decided to take apart Borchers’ dishonest piece point by point on our own site on August 15th. She also mentions that a comment we submitted in response to an August 10th Washington Post story on the subject by Callum Borchers was mysteriously deleted. In her column she generously cites to previous articles Catholics 4 Trump has written on this issue. On August 31st, Ann Coulter wrote an excellent column explaining how the media, especially the Washington Post, has been deliberately dishonest in claiming that Donald Trump mocked a New York Times reporter’s disability.
If it appears some American bishops are failing to wholly represent and advocate for the interests of the persecuted Church as communicated by Middle Eastern Church leaders, I would ask that the USCCB address their failure as a scandal of the first order.” Respectfully, I challenge the leadership of the USCCB to compare and contrast the priorities of the Church in the Middle East with the priorities of American bishops with regard to Islamic terrorism and refugee aid.
Shockingly, Middle Eastern Christian leaders’ perspective is not given pride of place by many U.S. I believe this is the most important article I’ve ever written–because it is almost entirely comprised of direct quotations from the courageous bishops and patriarchs of the Middle East, who know the threat of radical Islamic terrorism better than anyone after years of genocidal Jihadist attacks. To aid in the effort, I have compiled a simple study in contrasts… Respectfully, I call on the United States Council of Catholic Bishops to address it formally, publicly, and immediately. It is a scandal for American bishops to disagree with the persecuted Church during the course of a years-long, genocidal attack.
“Over the years, a pattern has emerged that can no longer be ignored: The rhetoric of many American bishops is consistently at odds with the pleas of Christian leaders in the Middle East.
0 kommentar(er)
